Harmonization of Administrative-Criminal Sanctions for State Losses After Constitutional Court Decision No.66/PUU-XXIV/2026
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The harmonization of administrative and criminal sanctions in addressing state financial losses following Constitutional Court Decision No. 66/PUU-XXIV/2026. The primary issue involves overlapping authority between internal oversight bodies and law enforcement agencies, creating potential legal uncertainty for public officials. Using a quantitative, comparative research design, the study analyzes secondary data on state loss cases before and after the ruling through descriptive and inferential statistical methods. The findings indicate that applying actual loss parameters and clearly distinguishing between maladministration and criminal acts of corruption significantly improves legal certainty and enhances state asset recovery. Enhanced coordination between internal oversight bodies and law enforcement agencies increases the effectiveness of administrative compensation mechanisms. Overall, harmonizing sanctions based on the principle of ultimum remedium balances safeguarding official discretion and ensuring proportional enforcement of anti-corruption laws. The results provide guidance for law enforcement policies that prioritize asset recovery while preventing the undue criminalization of policy decisions.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Akbar, Muhamad. “The Resolution and Accountability of State Financial Loss In Administrative and Criminal Law Perspectives.” Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist 8, no. 1 (December 29, 2023): 78–84. https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v8i1.4318.
Amiarsa, Pandji. “Status Delik Korupsi Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016 Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Pengembalian Kerugian Negara.” Syiar Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 19, no. 2 (December 25, 2021): 198–212. https://doi.org/10.29313/shjih.v19i2.8828.
Bawono, Bambang. “The Strategy For Handling Corruption’s Criminal Action Relationship to Saving of State Financial Losses.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 7, no. 3 (December 28, 2020): 222. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v7i3.13357.
Firdaus, Aras, Renhard Harve, and Bona Fernandez Martogitua Simbolon. “The Ultimate Remedium Principle in the Strategy of Returning and Recovering Corruption Crimes.” Sasi 28, no. 4 (2022): 544. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1039.
Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, I, Kairul Anwar, . Hartiwiningsih, and Abdul Kadir Jaelani. “The Recovery of State Assets Due to Bankruptcy in State-Owned Enterprises.” KnE Social Sciences 9, no. 1 (January 5, 2024): 428–435. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i21.14759.
Hanafi, Sahal. “Konsep Idealisasi Penegakan Hukum Pajak Dengan Eliminasi Administrative Penal Law Terhadap Pelanggaran Pajak Di Indonesia.” Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik 1, no. 4 (2023): 119–29. https://doi.org/10.51903/jaksa.v1i4.1400.
Hartanto, Heri. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pejabat Pemerintahan Terhadap Keputusan Diskresi yang Menimbulkan Kerugian Keuangan Negara.” Kertha Patrika 38, no. 3 (2016). https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthapatrika/article/view/30082/18454.
Hendrik, Charren. “Strategy to Strengthen State Administrative Law in Eradicating Corruption Practices by State Administration Officials.” Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev), no. Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Indonesian State Law Review (2022): 67–81. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/islrev/article/view/58672/22882.
Juliani, Henny. “Pertanggungjawaban Pejabat Pemerintahan Sebagai Akibat Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Yang Menimbulkan Kerugian Negara.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 4, no. 1 (2020): 54–70. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj/article/view/7977/4144.
Pudyatmoko, Yohanes, and Gregorius Aryadi. “Penerapan Kumulasi Sanksi Eksternal dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Korupsi Oleh Pejabat Pemerintahan di Kabupaten Sleman.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 2 (April 17, 2020): 155–74. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p155-174.
Putra, Moh. “Bentuk Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pejabat Pemerintah yang Tidak Dapat Dipidana.” JUSTISI 7, no. 2 (July 15, 2021): 118–36. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v7i2.1362.
Rahmawan, Ardianto Budi, Alyca Azka Nariswari, and Afnan Zahidatush. “Administrative Sanctions Governance Reform: Optimizing the Application of Administrative Sanctions in Indonesia.” Arena Hukum 18, no. 1 (2025): 73–101. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum2025.01801.4.
Sadat, Anwar. “The Application of the State Financial Losses’ Assessment in Corruption Crime after the Verdict of the Constitutional Court No. 31/Puu-x/2012.” Indonesian Journal Of Sustainability 1, no. 1 (January 26, 2022): 1. https://doi.org/10.30659/ijsunissula.1.1.1-27.
Sudarmanto, Kukuh, Muhammad Alvin Cyzentio Chairilian, and Kadi Sukarna. “Rekonstruksi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Sebagai Alternatif Pengganti Pidana Penjara.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 825–40. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i2.7224.
Sudarsana, I, and Aaa Gorda. “Measuring Corruption Tendency in Exercising Authority of the Proxy of Budget User: A Legal Culture Perspective.” Udayana Journal of Law and Culture 7, no. 2 (July 31, 2023): 178. https://doi.org/10.24843/UJLC.2023.v07.i02.p04.
Suhendar, Suhendar, and Kartono Kartono. “Kerugian Keuangan Negara Telaah dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara Dan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan 11, no. 2 (December 1, 2020): 233. https://doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v11i2.8048.
Susanto, Sri. “Karakter Yuridis Sanksi Hukum Administrasi: Suatu Pendekatan Komparasi.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 2, no. 1 (June 11, 2019): 126–42. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i1.126-142.
Suwandi, Dedy, and Wafda Vivid Izziyana. “The Effectiveness of Administrative Sanctions in Promoting Legal Compliance in Indonesian Legislation.” Realism: Law Review 4, no. April (2026): 1–21.
Syamsuddin, Ahmad Rustan. “‘Evidence of Abusing Authority in Criminal Procurement Corruption of Goods and Services.’” Jambura Law Review 2, no. 2 (2020): 161–81. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5942.
Zaid, M, Rabani M Halawa, Kartika Asmanda Putri, Fadhel Arjuna Adinda, and Lamberton Cait. “Eradicating Public Official Corruption Indonesia: A Revolutionary Paradigm Focusing on State Financial Losses.” Wacana Hukum 29, no. 2 (2023): 87–111. https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v29i2.9564.
Zaid, M, Rabani Halawa, Kartika Putri, Fadhel Adinda, and Lamberton Cait. “Eradicating Public Official Corruption Indonesia: A Revolutionary Paradigm Focusing on State Financial Losses.” Wacana Hukum 29, no. 2 (October 31, 2023): 87–111. https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v29i2.9564.