The effectiveness of KONI pre-arbitration in the settlement of National Sports Disputes
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study analyzes the effectiveness of KONI pre-arbitration in resolving national sports disputes and protecting athletes’ rights. The issue is significant because sports disputes require mechanisms that are faster, more adaptive, and more compatible with sports governance than ordinary litigation. This normative legal research uses statutory and historical approaches, supported by legal interpretation of primary regulations, organizational documents, and relevant scholarly literature. The findings show that KONI pre-arbitration has three strategic functions: facilitating internal deliberation, filtering disputes before formal arbitration, and serving as a procedural gateway to the Indonesian Sports Arbitration Board. Its effectiveness depends on clear operating standards, formal documentation, administrative support, institutional compliance, and consistent protection of athletes affected by organizational or contractual disputes. Strengthening standard procedures, minutes of settlement or deadlock, referral mechanisms, and administrative enforcement is therefore necessary to ensure legal certainty, prevent prolonged conflict, and safeguard athletes’ professional interests effectively within the national sports system.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Ardiansyah, Ari, Razali Razali, Ahadin Ahadin, and Syamsulrizal Syamsulrizal. “Policy Analysis of the Indonesian National Sports Committee at the Provincial Level in Improving Athlete Achievement.” International Journal of Social Science and Human Research 7, no. 08 (August 2024). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i08-66.
Baihaiqi, Muhammad Rizqon, Siti Ummu Adillah, and Dahniarti Hasana. “Juridical Overview of the Use of Smart Contracts in Indonesia as a Form of Artificial Intelligence Development.” Sultan Agung Notary Law Review 4, no. 1 (2022): 111. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.1.111-123.
Binathara, Muhammad Bagus, and dan Muhammad Hamid Anwar. “The Problems of Transferring Athletes in Sports Multi-Events.” International Journal of Physical Education Sports and Health 9, no. 2 (2022): 236–39. https://doi.org/10.22271/kheljournal.2022.v9.i2d.2474.
Kartika, Niko Martin, and Anggit Wicaksono. “Profil Manajemen Organisasi Perbasi Kabupaten Blora.” Unnes Journal of Sport Sciences 7, no. 2 (2023): 82–86. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujoss.v7i2.65241.
Murib, Teguh Wan, Razali Razali, Yeni Marlina, Mansur Mansur, Miskalena Miskalena, and Abdurrahman Abdurrahman. “Analysis of Athlete Rights Fulfillment in the KONI Aceh Development Training Center, Indonesia.” Path of Science 10, no. 2 (2024): 3001–6. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.101-3.
Prasetio, Dicky Eko, and Zeidan Izza Al-Farisi. “Lex Sportiva in Indonesian Sports Law: Autonomy, Independence, and Harmonization with National Law.” Indonesian Journal of Sports Law 1, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.26740/ijsl.v1i02.35931.
Putra, Sri Gilang Muhammad Sultan Rahma. “Legal Reconstruction of Implementation Legally Binding Verdict in Industrial Relations Court.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 9, no. 1 (April 2020): 99. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.99-115.
Sanusi, Sanusi, and Slamet Riyanto. “Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Olahraga Di Indonesia Di Luar Pengadilan Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi 23, no. 2 (2024): 347–60. https://doi.org/10.21009/jimd.v23i2.49742.
Setiyono, Setiyono, Dinda Keumala, Ahmad Sabirin, Nur Ezan Rahmat, Syaqila Binte Suzaini, and Anandayu Pavita Bayuaji. “The Establishment of LAPS SJK in the Trajectory of History Viewed from the Politics of Indonesian Law.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 15, no. 1 (2024): 106. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v15i1.a28385.
Silvana, Nina, Agus Surono, and Adnan Hamid. “Building a Framework for Sports Dispute Settlement: Legal Mechanism and Alternative Approaches in Indonesia.” Journal Evidence Of Law 4, no. 1 (2025): 89–94. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v4i1.969.
Subrata, Rusli. “Mechanisms Of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Conflict and Dispute Resolution in Indonesia.” LITIGASI 24, no. 1 (2023): 151–64. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v24i1.7198.
Sumertajaya, I Ketut Satria Wiradharma, Kadek Ary Purnama Dewi, and Ni Putu Ari Setyaningsih. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Upah Pemain Sepakbola Profesional Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2022 Tentang Keolahragaan.” Jurnal Yustitia 17, no. 2 (2023): 76–86. https://doi.org/10.62279/yustitia.v17i2.1128.
Sutrisno, Sutrisno. “Kebijakan Sistem Penegakan Hukum Menuju Hukum Berkeadilan.” Pagaruyuang Law Journal 3, no. 2 (2020): 183–96. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v3i2.1833.
Vidyapramatya, Nurindria Naharista, Emmy Latifah, Elfia Farida, and Antonius Alexander Tigor. “Authority of the Dispute Council in the Resolution of Construction Disputes in Indonesia.” LAW REFORM 19, no. 1 (2023): 88–109. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i1.49141.
Wahyunitha, Agnes, Andika Wijaya, and Satriya Nugraha. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Keolahragaan Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW 9, no. 1 (2026): 132–52. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v9i1.13209.