Publication Ethics
Publication Ethics
The Journal of Law, Human Rights, Immigration, and Corrections is committed to the highest ethical standards throughout its publication process. This policy adheres to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and covers the following aspects:
1. Originality and Plagiarism
All manuscripts must be original works and have not been published elsewhere. Authors must cite sources properly and avoid copying text, ideas, tables, or figures without proper permission and attribution. The journal uses plagiarism detection software to check manuscripts for originality.
2. Authorship and Contributorship
Only individuals who made significant contributions to the concept, design, data analysis, or writing of the manuscript should be credited as authors. All authors must approve the final version of the manuscript and are accountable for its overall integrity. Non-author contributions (e.g., technical support or funding) should be acknowledged in the Acknowledgments section.
3. Conflict of Interest
Authors, editors, and reviewers must disclose any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest that might influence the interpretation of the data or recommendations. This disclosure must be made in the manuscript and on the form submitted to the editor.
4. Data Integrity and Transparency
Authors are expected to provide raw data, protocols, and other research materials upon request from editors or readers. Any data manipulation must be clearly explained. Research fraud, including fabrication, falsification, or manipulation of data, will result in retraction of the manuscript.
5. Ethical Approval and Consent
Research involving human or animal subjects must obtain approval from an accredited ethics committee. Authors must include the ethics approval number and the licensing body. For studies involving human participants, written informed consent from the participant or their legal guardian must be obtained and reported.
6. Peer Review Process
The journal employs a double-blind peer review system to maintain the confidentiality of authors and reviewers. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two expert reviewers and one editor. Reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive, and timely evaluations.
7. Corrections, Retractions, and Withdrawals
If substantive errors are detected after publication, the journal will issue a correction (erratum) or retraction, depending on the severity. Authors' retraction requests will be considered if there is evidence of serious methodological errors or misleading findings.
8. Confidentiality
Editors, editorial staff, and reviewers are required to maintain the confidentiality of all submitted materials and must not use manuscript information for personal gain before publication.
9. Handling Misconduct
Alleged ethical violations will be investigated according to COPE procedures. If proven, the manuscript will be rejected or the published article will be retracted. Authors or reviewers found to be in violation may be subject to sanctions, including a ban on submissions for a specified period.
Through this policy, the Journal of Law, Human Rights, Immigration, and Corrections ensures integrity, fairness, and trustworthiness at every stage of publication.