Civil Society As Constitutional Guardians: Comparative Analysis And Indonesian Prospects Masyarakat Sipil sebagai Penjaga Konstitusi: Analisis Perbandingan dan Prospek Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines civil society organizations (CSOs) as constitutional guardians in Indonesia through comparative constitutional analysis. Although prior scholarship has documented procedural aspects of constitutional complaints, the participatory dynamics through which CSOs strengthen constitutional accountability remain underexplored. Employing normative legal-juridical methodology and comparative law analysis, this research examines CSO engagement models in South Korea, South Africa, and Germany to derive lessons for Indonesia's constitutional system. The study identifies institutional and procedural barriers impeding optimal CSO participation, including limited legal standing and high access costs. Empirical findings demonstrate that CSOs significantly influence constitutional courts by expanding access to justice, contributing expertise, and catalyzing jurisprudential innovation. In Indonesia, the emerging amicus curiae practice signals potential for deeper CSO involvement; however, structural constraints remain. This study concludes that comprehensive institutional reform is imperative. Key recommendations include formalizing CSO standing through Constitutional Court Law amendments and lowering access barriers to strengthen participatory democracy and safeguard citizens' constitutional rights.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
[1] M. L. Chakim, “A Comparative Perspective on Constitutional Complaint: Discussing Models, Procedures, and Decisions,” Const. Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 096–133, May 2019, doi: 10.31078/consrev514.
[2] G. Tatawu and A. Tawai, “The Transformation of the Role of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia: From Negative Legislature to Positive Legislature in the Context of Judicial Review Authority (A Study of Decision Number 90/Puu-Xxi/2023),” J. Law Sustain. Dev., vol. 11, no. 12, p. e2187, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.2187.
[3] I. D. G. Palguna, “Constitutional Complaint and the Protection of Citizens the Constitutional Rights,” Const. Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–23, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.31078/consrev311.
[4] A. I. Hamzani, T. V. Widyastuti, N. Khasanah, and M. H. Mohd Rusli, “Implementation approach in legal research,” Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 380–388, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijaas.v13.i2.pp380-388.
[5] I. Sujono, “Urgensi Penemuan Hukum dan Penggunaan Yurisprudensi dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 585–607, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.31078/jk1835.
[6] L. Vinx, Ed., The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, 2015. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316136256.
[7] S.-H. Jeon, “A Critical Review on Composition of the Constitutional Court of Korea,” Const. Rev., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–32, May 2024, doi: 10.31078/consrev1011.
[8] D. A. G. S. Dewi, X. Nugraha, and M. E. Laurentius, “The Authority of the Constitutional Court in Handling Constitutional Complaints: A Comparative Study with Germany and South Korea,” Const. Law Soc., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 127–139, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.36448/cls.v1i2.28.
[9] D. Mitra, “Systemic Crises and Democratic Consolidation: Exploring Citizen Perceptions in South Korea,” Int. Area Stud. Rev., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 62–87, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.69473/iasr.2025.28.1.62.
[10] B. Phillips, “South Korean Constitutional Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision in Climate Litigation,” International IDEA. [Online]. Available: https://www.idea.int/news/south-korean-constitutional-court-ruling-landmark-decision-climate-litigation
[11] C. Swanepoel, “The public-interest action in South Africa: The transformative injunction of the South African Constitution,” J. Juridical Sci., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 29–46, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.18820/24150517/JJS41.v2.3.
[12] E. Cohen, “The Jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court,” Const. Court Rev., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–49, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.2989/CCR.2021.0016.
[13] Legal Tribune Online, “So viele Anträge auf Eilrechtsschutz wie nie zuvor,” Legal Tribune Online. [Online]. Available: https://www.lto.de/persistent/a_id/54093
[14] T. Lailam and N. Andrianti, “Legal Policy of Constitutional Complaints in Judicial Review: A Comparison of Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Indonesia,” BESTUUR, vol. 11, no. 1 (August), pp. 75–94, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.70052.
[15] J. Thomas and V. Liman, “Analysis Of Opportunities For Implementing The Amicus Curiae Concept As A Form Of Public Participation In The Judicial System In Indonesia,” J. Huk. dan Peradil., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–32, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.25216/jhp.13.1.2024.1-32.
[16] Sulistyowati, L. Mery, D. N. Maharani, and A. Andika, “The Urgency of Amicus Curiae in The Indonesian Law (A Case Study of the 2024 Presidential Election Dispute),” Alauddin Law Dev. J., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 578–587, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.24252/aldev.v6i3.51252.
[17] R. N. A. A.K., M. Akib, and B. Budiyono, “Rekonstruksi Terhadap Sifat Final Dan Mengikat Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” FIAT JUSTISIAJurnal Ilmu Huk., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 795–820, May 2017, doi: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no4.860.
[18] Johannes Edison Haholongan, “The Introduction of Amicus Curiae as Formal Legal Instrument to Enhance Judicial Integrity,” Jud. Laguens, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 237–264, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.25216/ikahi.2.2.8.2024.237-264.
[19] G. T. I. Tawakkal, “Integrating Social Values: Evidence from The Intermediary Institution in Indonesian Elections,” Polit. J. Ilmu Polit., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 337–348, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.14710/politika.13.2.2022.337-348.
[20] H. Kristiyanto, S. Arinanto, and H. S. Ghafur, “Institutionalization and party resilience in Indonesian electoral democracy,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 12, p. e22919, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22919.
[21] F. A. Saputro, “Digital Democracy: Exploring the Potential and Challenges of SIPOL in the 2024 Indonesian Election,” J. La Soc., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 777–784, May 2024, doi: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v5i3.1163.
[22] A. Na’im, F. Mu’in, K. , and R. Santoso, “The Effectiveness of Election Supervisors in Participatory Supervision and the Production of High-Quality Executive and Legislative Leaders,” KnE Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 194–203, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.18502/kss.v10i8.18433.
[23] M. M. Fajri, “Masyarakat Sipil Dukung MK: Kawal Putusan UU Pilkada Demi Demokrasi Indonesia,” Info Publik. [Online]. Available: https://infopublik.id/kategori/nasional-politik-hukum/863438/index.html
[24] Cekli Setya Pratiwi, “Threat to Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Independence Posed by Religious Populist Movements and its Implication Towards Human Rights,” Const. Rev., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 307–339, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.31078/consrev1022.
[25] Idul Rishan, “Constitutional Court Regression in Post- Democratic Transition: A Comparison of Court Packing in Hungary, Poland, and Indonesia,” Const. Rev., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 451–473, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.31078/consrev1026.
[26] G. Tatawu and A. Tawai, “The Transformation of the Role of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia: From Negative Legislature to Positive Legislature in the Context of Judicial Review Authority (A Study of Decision Number 90/Puu-Xxi/2023),” J. Law Sustain. Dev., vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1–17, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.2187.
[27] A. Awanisa, Y. Yusdianto, and S. Khoiriah, “The Position of Constitutional Complaint in the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia,” Pancasila Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 61–78, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.25041/plr.v2i1.2308.
[28] M. S. Bin-Armia, M. S. Armia, F. F. Rifqy, H. Tengku-Armia, and C. R. Mustika, “From Constitutional-Court To Court Of Cartel: A Comparative Study Of Indonesia And Other Countries,” PETITA J. Kaji. ILMU Huk. DAN SYARIAH, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 457–479, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.22373/petita.v9i2.437.
[29] S. Warjiyati, K. M. Ibrahim, S. Salam, and U. Faruq, “Complaint Authority for Constitutional Complaint by Indonesia’s Constitutional Court,” J. IUS Kaji. Huk. dan Keadilan, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 303–315, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.29303/ius.v10i2.1070.