Optimizing Land Dispute Resolution Through Mediation: A Legal Analysis of Biau District, Buol Regency

Main Article Content

Moh. Ifan Ridwansyah
Nirwan Junus
Sri Nanang Meiske Kamba

Abstract

Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in developing nations frequently experience structural dysfunctions within complex agrarian governance. This study examines the optimization of land dispute resolution through mediation in Biau District, Buol Regency. Employing a qualitative socio-legal approach, primary empirical data were gathered via purposive sampling across twenty-three key informants and analyzed rigorously using an interactive qualitative model. Grounded in Lawrence Friedman’s legal system theory, the findings reveal that mediation failures do not stem from statutory deficits, but rather from deep-seated structural pathologies, specifically uncertified local mediators, and cultural patron-client dynamics that systematically distort neutrality. Consequently, grassroots consensus frequently suffers from severe executive impotence. To resolve this procedural impasse, this article conceptualizes the Tripartite Alliance for Site Agrarian Resolution. This framework integrates local government, agrarian offices, and judicial courts via e-Court networks to transform informal settlements into legally binding settlement deeds (Acta van Dading), thereby guaranteeing absolute enforcement and sustainable agrarian justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Moh. Ifan Ridwansyah, et al. “Optimizing Land Dispute Resolution Through Mediation: A Legal Analysis of Biau District, Buol Regency”. Nusantara: Journal of Law and Islamic Law, vol. 2, no. 1, June 2026, pp. 20-37, https://doi.org/10.65101/nusantara.v2i1.324.

References

Achmad, Willya. “Konflik Sengketa Lahan Dan Strategi Penyelesaian Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik 6, no. 1 (February 11, 2024): 8–18. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v6i1.53280.

Amzulian, Aussielia. “The Future of Arbitration for Personal Data Disputes in Indonesia: Weighing the Benefits and Challenges.” Media Iuris 8, no. 2 (June 30, 2025): 215–38. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v8i2.63060.

Anindito, Teguh, Aris Priyadi, and Arif Awaludin. “Pelaksanaan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan Negeri Banyumas.” Cakrawala Hukum: Majalah Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma 24, no. 1 (March 10, 2022): 23–32. https://doi.org/10.51921/chk.wqps6488.

Banakar, Reza, and Max Travers. Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005.

Biryukov, S. V. “Santi Romano and the Concept of Legal Pluralism.” Lex Russica 76, no. 6 (June 15, 2023): 138–47. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.199.6.138-147.

Creswell, John W, and J David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications, 2017.

Dwinando, Zaqi Aulia, Marlinah, and Andri Zulpan. “Upaya Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Penyerobotan Tanah Di Kota Bengkulu.” Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 3, no. 4 (August 28, 2025): 3761–75. https://ejournal.yayasanpendidikandzurriyatulquran.id/index.php/AlZayn/article/view/1926.

Engle Merry, Sally. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22, no. 5 (July 1, 1988): 869–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638.

Friedman, Lawrence M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective . New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.

Haiban, M Azka. “Subjek Hukum Investasi Internasional Dalam Forum ICSID: Teori Dan Praktiknya.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 2741–52. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1076.

Hambloch, Caroline, Claudia Coral, Guido Maschhaupt, and Dagmar Mithöfer. “Power from below: Rethinking Bargaining Power in Global Value Chains.” Review of International Political Economy 33, no. 3 (May 4, 2026): 1017–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2025.2610737.

Jayadi, Hendri, Tomson Situmeang, Poltak Siringoringo, I Dewa Ayu Widyani, and L Elly AM Pandiangan. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Comunità Servizio 5, no. 1 (April 17, 2023): 1050–1069. https://doi.org/10.33541/cs.v5i1.4287.

Krisanto, Yakub Adi. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Melalui Mediasi Di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Salatiga.” Magistrorum et Scholarium: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 4, no. 1 (December 22, 2023): 16–26. https://doi.org/10.24246/jms.v4i12023p16-26.

Liquigan Eustaquio, Theresa. “Recalibrating Philippine Criminal Justice: A Legal Analysis of Restorative Justice within the Framework of the Juvenile Justice and Barangay Systems.” Mimbar Keadilan 19, no. 1 (January 28, 2026): 42–53. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v19i1.132587.

Lumentung, Imelda Astreed S., Kristi W. Simanjuntak, and A. Sakti. R. S. Rakia. “Efektivitas Mediasi Dengan Pendekatan Kolaboratif Dalam Menyelesaikan Kasus Pertanahan Di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Sorong.” Judge: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 2 (May 31, 2025): 218–27. https://journal.cattleyadf.org/index.php/Judge/article/view/1368.

Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014.

Mustika, Nasya, Yusri Muhammad Arsyad, and Hasanna Lawang. “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Ketidakberhasilan Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewarisan Tanah: Studi Kasus Perkara No. 292/Pdt.G/2024/PA.PW Di Pengadilan Agama Pasarwajo.” At-Tasyrih: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Hukum Islam 11, no. 2 (December 23, 2025): 532–41. https://ejournal.unisbajambi.ac.id/index.php/attasyrih/article/view/493.

Ningsih, Riska Kurnia, and Hadi Tuasikal. “Tantangan Dan Solusi Dalam Implementasi Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah.” Journal of Dual Legal Systems 2, no. 1 (April 9, 2025): 70–89. https://journal.staisar.ac.id/index.php/jdls/article/view/323.

Nurzia, U. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Melalui Mediasi.” CBJIS: Cross-Border Journal of Islamic Studies 7, no. 1 (June 30, 2025): 227–33. https://doi.org/10.37567/cbjis.v7i1.3985.

Rolando, Rio, Santy Fitnawati, Dwi Juniyanto, and Nahes Setiawan. “Hukum Agraria Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Di Indonesia.” Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik 2, no. 1 (January 16, 2024): 319–27. https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v2i1.1682.

Sagoni, Sulaeman, Rahmi, and Sitti Hijrah. “Efektivitas Hukum Terhadap Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Di Kelurahan Cina, Kecamatan Pammana, Kabupaten Wajo.” Legal Journal of Law 2, no. 1 (May 15, 2023): 79–90. https://jurnal.lamaddukelleng.ac.id/index.php/legal/article/view/51.

Setiady, Tri, and Yulia Putri Maulina. “Kekuatan Mengikat Hukum Mediasi Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Ditinjau Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan ADR.” Jurnal UDA 32, no. 4 (September 1, 2024): 423–434. https://jurnal.universitasdarmaagung.ac.id/jurnaluda/article/view/4616.

Sulfian, A. Sultan. “Optimalisasi Peran Badan Pertanahan Nasional Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Agraria Melalui Jalur Mediasi.” Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan 24, no. 1 (August 30, 2025): 151–61. https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v24i1.10329.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.