Fair Value Determination for Minority Shareholder Appraisal Rights: Comparative Indonesia and Singapore

Main Article Content

Adin Pramudito Nugroho

Abstract

Indonesian corporate law formally recognizes minority shareholder appraisal rights but lacks methodological parameters for fair value determination, rendering statutory protections completely ineffective against majority shareholder oppression. This study conducts normative legal research utilizing statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches to effectively contrast Indonesian regulations with Singaporean jurisprudence and global corporate valuation standards. Results reveal that Singapore proactively replaces statutory appraisal rights with comprehensive oppression remedies, empowering courts to strictly enforce commercial fairness via mandatory buyouts that absolutely prohibit minority discounts. In stark contrast, Indonesia's existing normative void systemically facilitates structural asymmetry and massive wealth appropriation. To fix this legal vacuum, Indonesia must rapidly reconstruct its corporate litigation framework by statutorily adopting established commercial fairness doctrines. Legislators must explicitly mandate binding judicial guidelines requiring independent financial valuers and formally abolish all minority discount applications. This vital systemic integration will successfully elevate domestic corporate governance toward superior global dispute resolution quality and justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Adin Pramudito Nugroho. “Fair Value Determination for Minority Shareholder Appraisal Rights: Comparative Indonesia and Singapore”. Nusantara: Journal of Law and Islamic Law, vol. 2, no. 1, June 2026, pp. 1-19, https://doi.org/10.65101/nusantara.v2i1.325.

References

Byrka-Kita, Katarzyna, and Michał Grudziński. “Control Premium and Minority Discounts in Polish Business Valuation Practices – Evidence From Research.” Financial Internet Quarterly 13, no. 1 (January 10, 2024): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/fiqf-2016-0014.

Canada Business Corporations Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-44) (1985). https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-44/section-241.html.

Catur Budi Nugraha, Tarsisius, and Sri Wahyuni. “Determinants of the Discount for Lack of Marketability in Business Valuation: Evidence from Indonesia.” Journal of Accounting and Finance Management 6, no. 4 (October 24, 2025): 2245–54. https://doi.org/10.38035/jafm.v6i4.2492.

Hamdani, Assaf, Beni Lauterbach, and Yevgeny Mugerman. “Reservation Prices in Shareholders’ Response to Freeze-out Tender Offers.” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 64 (January 2020): 101160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2019.101160.

Ho Yew Kong v Sakae Holdings Ltd [2018] SGCA 33 (2018). https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/s/2018_SGCA_33.

Hutchinson, Terry. “Doctrinal Research.” In Research Methods in Law, 8–38. London: Routledge, 2025. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032710372-2.

Iida, Hidefusa. “How Does the Appraisal Right with the Concept of the Fair Value Including Synergies Work?: Lessons from Japan.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 18, no. 3 (December 22, 2023): 407–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2023.22.

Kampen, Liam. “Minority Buy-out Rights: Questioning the Right to Exit in New Zealand.” Te Mata Koi: Auckland University Law Review 29 (January 1, 2023): 265–93.

Kohar, Fiona Priscilia, and Yetty Komalasari Dewi. “Abuse of Rights by Majority Shareholders in Indonesian Family-Owned Company: Is It Likely?” Sriwijaya Law Review 6, no. 2 (January 31, 2021): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss1.887.pp29-41.

Ng Kek Wee v Sim City Technology Ltd (2014). https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/s/2014_SGCA_47.

Over & Over Ltd v Bonvests Holdings Ltd and Another (2008). https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/s/2008_SGHC_226.

Pangestu, Lintang Caesar, Zakiah Noer, and Dara. “Perlindungan Terhadap Pemegang Saham Minoritas Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas.” Judge: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 7 (February 7, 2026): 2101–8. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i07.2067.

Priandhana, Anandiaz Raditya, Paramita Prananigtyas, and Siti Mahmudah. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Saham Minoritas Dalam Merger Perbankan Berdasarkan Single Presence Policy (Studi Kasus Pada PT. Bank KEB Indonesia Dan PT. Bank Hana Indonesia).” Diponegoro Law Journal, 5, no. 40 (2016): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.13743.

Putri, Melisa Dwi, and Muhammad Fahmi Reksa Al Farisi. “Comparison of Derivative Action Regulations in Indonesia and South Korea in Providing Legal Protection for Minority Shareholders.” Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum 21, no. 02 (November 14, 2024): 40–54. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v21i02.9849.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2108 K/Pdt/2015, tanggal 25 November 2015, antara Jhon Kumala melawan PT Karya Lestari Makmur (2015).

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3017 K/Pdt/2011, tanggal 12 September 2012, antara PT Sumalindo Lestari Jaya Tbk melawan Deddy Hartawan Jamin, dkk (2012).

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 737/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Sby, tanggal 2015, antara Conal Kanginan, dkk. melawan Fadjar Kanginan, dkk (PT Giunco Kota Mas) (2015).

Rahmawati, Dwi, Bismar Nasution, Suhaidi Suhaidi, and Mahmul Siregar. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Saham Minoritas Dalam Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas.” Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 2, no. 1 (June 30, 2021): 34–48. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i1.76.

Saputra, I Kadek Andika, Johanes Ibrahim Kosasih, and I Nyoman Sujana. “Multiple Interpretations of Determining the Reasonable Price of Shares in the Process of Acquiring Rural Banks (BPR).” In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 615–23, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-180-7_66.

Sari, Maya, Abdul Rachmad Budiono, and Hanif Nur Widhiyanti. “Analisa Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Saham Minoritas Dalam Proses Akuisisi Berdasarkan Pasal 126 Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan 2, no. 2 (December 12, 2017): 115–24. https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115.

Section 216 of the Companies Act (Cap. 50) (1976). https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CoA1967?ProvIds=pr216-.

Singapore Companies Act 1967 (Chapter 50) (1976). https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act-Rev/CoA1967/Published/20211231?DocDate=20061031.

Takke, Shareen Virgita Septalia. “Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Saham Minoritas Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Kekuasaan Pemegang Saham Mayoritas Di Indonesia Dan Singapura.” Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) 4, no. 1 (2025): 509–12. https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/MHI/article/view/2794.

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) (2007).

Wardani, Theresia N. A, Herry M Polontoh, Lilik Prihatin, Harry Tuhumury, and Septiana Na’afi. “Perlindungan Hak Pemegang Saham Minoritas Dalam Perseroan Terbatas: Analisis Terhadap Implementasi Ketentuan UU Perseroan Terbatas Dalam Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum Di Lingkungan Bisnis Modern.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 5, no. 4 (May 9, 2025): 3674–86. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i4.4534.