The Implementation of the Think-Pair-Share Technique to Improve Students' Reading Comprehension

Main Article Content

Anni Nurul Hidayati
Ririn Dwi Kartikasari

Abstract

Reading comprehension instruction globally and in Indonesia frequently suffers from passive, teacher-dominated paradigms, resulting in alarmingly low student proficiency. This research systematically employed a Classroom Action Research design across three iterative cycles to investigate the Think-Pair-Share technique's direct impact on eleventh-grade students' comprehensive understanding of complex hortatory exposition texts at MAN Klaten. Mixed-methods data, explicitly including standardized test scores alongside structured qualitative observation rubrics, were rigorously collected and comprehensively analyzed. The findings unequivocally revealed that this structural implementation significantly enhanced cognitive proficiency, escalating the mean reading score from 52.73 to 84.55 while drastically reducing overall score dispersion. Furthermore, students exhibited elevated academic confidence and highly equitable participation during active peer-mediated negotiations. Replacing traditional instructional models with this collaborative technique successfully mandates individual cognitive accountability and fundamentally democratizes classroom dynamics, providing a robust empirical blueprint for global educators to actively foster independent, lifelong reading literacy within modern educational learning environments effectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hidayati, Anni Nurul, and Ririn Dwi Kartikasari. “The Implementation of the Think-Pair-Share Technique to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension”. Journal of Educational Research and Learning Analytics, vol. 2, no. 1, July 2026, pp. 1-18, https://doi.org/10.65101/jerlra.v2i1.347.

References

Ahmadi, Heidar, Biook Behnam, and Zohreh Seifoori. “Think-Pair-Share as a Formative Assessment Strategy: EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Learning.” Journal of Applied Linguistic Studies 3, no. 1 (2024): 183–97. https://oiccpress.com/jals/article/view/5600.

Alazemi, Asmaa Falah Theiyab. “Formative Assessment in Artificial Integrated Instruction: Delving into the Effects on Reading Comprehension Progress, Online Academic Enjoyment, Personal Best Goals, and Academic Mindfulness.” Language Testing in Asia 14, no. 1 (October 18, 2024): 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00319-8.

Capin, Philip, Katlynn Dahl-Leonard, Colby Hall, Na Young Yoon, Eunsoo Cho, Eleni Chatzoglou, Sarah Reiley, et al. “Reading Comprehension Instruction: Evaluating Our Progress Since Durkin’s Seminal Study.” Scientific Studies of Reading 29, no. 1 (January 2, 2025): 85–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2024.2418582.

Collins, Molly F. “Supporting Inferential Thinking in Preschoolers: Effects of Discussion on Children’s Story Comprehension.” Early Education and Development 27, no. 7 (October 2, 2016): 932–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1170523.

EL-Asri, Samira, and Abderrahim El Karfa. “A Mixed-Method Action Research on Promoting Critical Thinking in the Classroom: Implications for EFL Teachers.” Arab World English Journal 15, no. 2 (June 28, 2024): 288–304. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no2.18.

Fethi, Naila, and Krisztián Józsa. “The Simple View of Reading as a Cognitive Framework for Multilingual Reading Comprehension Assessment.” Frontiers in Education 11 (January 23, 2026). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1737066.

Ibrahim, Mohammed Ali El-Siddig, Musadhique Kottaparamban, Fawzi Eltayeb Yousuf Ahmed, Elsadig Hussein Fadlalla Ali, and Saima Usmani. “AI Enhanced Reading Comprehension through Personalized Learning Environments.” Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change 10, no. 2 (November 25, 2025): 3900–3912. https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i2.2203.

Maryansyah, Yupika, Agus Riyanto, and Muhammad Parli. “Artificial Intelligence in Teaching EFL Reading: A Literature Review of Trends, Pedagogical Approaches, and Future Directions (2019–2025).” Journal of Science, Technology, and Social Innovation 1, no. 1 (November 6, 2025): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.58723/jstsi.v1i1.44.

Mohammadi, Roya Ranjbar, Mahnaz Saeidi, and Saeideh Ahangari. “Self-Regulated Learning Instruction and the Relationships among Self-Regulation, Reading Comprehension and Reading Problem Solving: PLS-SEM Approach.” Edited by Sammy King Fai HUI. Cogent Education 7, no. 1 (January 1, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1746105.

Mushaddiq, Mushaddiq, Nurdin Noni, Abdullah Abdullah, and Muhammad Tahir. “Exploring EFL Students’ Creativity and Engagement with AI Chatbot in Web-Based English Course.” GLENS: Global English Insights Journal 2, no. 1 (November 18, 2024): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.61220/glens.v2i1.591.

Namaziandost, Ehsan, Mina Homayouni, and Pegah Rahmani. “The Impact of Cooperative Learning Approach on the Development of EFL Learners’ Speaking Fluency.” Cogent Arts & Humanities 7, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 1780811. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1780811.

Nguyen, Tran Ngoc Tuong, and Duong Thi Kim Oanh. “Cooperative Learning and Its Influences on Student Engagement.” Cogent Education 12, no. 1 (December 31, 2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2513414.

OECD. PISA 2022 Results (Volume III): Creative Minds, Creative Schools. PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2-en.

———. PISA 2022 Results Volume III: Creative Minds, Creative Schools, Factsheets-Indonesia. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-results-2022-volume-iii-factsheets_041a90f1-en/indonesia_a7090b49-en.html.

Peng, Ziying, and Arumugam Raman. “Systematic Literature Review on the Effects of Blended Learning in EFL Education.” Contemporary Educational Technology 18, no. 1 (February 16, 2026): ep631. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17924.

Pine, Gerald J. “A Paradigm of Teacher Action Research.” In Teacher Action Research: Building Knowledge Democracies, 62–79. California: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2009. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452275079.n3.

Pratolo, Bambang Widi, Dat Bao, and Suhendri Palaguna. “Enhancing Reading Comprehension and Motivation through Think-Pair-Share: Classroom Action Research in an Indonesian EFL Context.” English Language Teaching Educational Journal 8, no. 1 (August 29, 2025): 54–65. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v8i1.13992.

Salim, Amalia Nabila, and Disman Disman. “The Implementation of the TPS (Think-Pair-Share) Learning Model To Improve Students Critical Thinking Skills.” Jurnal Lingua Idea 14, no. 1 (June 30, 2023): 15–29. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jli.2023.14.1.8318.

Zeng, Yanfang, Li-Jen Kuo, Lu Chen, Jr-An Lin, and Haoran Shen. “Vocabulary Instruction for English Learners: A Systematic Review Connecting Theories, Research, and Practices.” Education Sciences 15, no. 3 (February 20, 2025): 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030262.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.