Psikolinguistik Dalam Perspektif Digital: Pengaruh Media Sosial Terhadap Produksi Bahasa Mahasiswa
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study analyzes the influence of social media on students' language production from a psycholinguistic perspective, highlighting how digital interactions shape linguistic behavior and cognitive processes in language production. Digital technology has changed students' communication patterns and given rise to new forms of language such as abbreviations, emoticons, code-mixing, and syntactic simplification. Using a descriptive qualitative approach through documentation and conversation observation, this study identifies linguistic phenomena on WhatsApp, Instagram, and TikTok. The analysis is based on Levelt's speech production model, which includes the stages of conceptualization, formulation, and articulation. The results show that social media influences speech planning, lexical selection, and syntactic arrangement. Preliminary quantitative indications regarding the frequency of digital language use enrich the perspective of learning analytics. The study concludes that social media is a space for the formation of students' linguistic identity and has implications for digital literacy and academic language competence.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Adlini, Miza Nina, Anisya Hanifa Dinda, Sarah Yulinda, Octavia Chotimah, and Sauda Julia Merliyana. “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka.” Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan 6, no. 1 (2022): 974–80. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394.
Baron, Naomi. Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford University Press, 2008.
Creswell, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014.
Crystal, David. Language and the Internet, 2nd Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Denis, Sali A. Tagliamonte and Derek. “Linguistic Rupture in Digital Communication.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2017.
Fitriani, Nurul. “Psikolinguistik Dalam Komunikasi Digital Mahasiswa.” Jurnal Psikologi Bahasa, 2020.
Grosjean, François. Bilingual: Life and Reality. Harvard University Press, 2010.
Kemp, Simon. Digital 2022 Global Overview Report. DataReportal, 2022.
Levelt, Willem J. M. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.
Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014.
Puspayanti, Elisabet Yuliasari, Junita Indri, Sman Cariu, Bogor Smk, An Nur, Highfield Secondary Shcool, and Jakarta Smpn Pangkalan. “Peran Psikolinguistik Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di Era Digital.” JUPENSAL : Jurnal Pendidikan Universal 1, no. 3 (2024): 541–55. https://journalwbl.com/index.php/jupensal/article/view/362.
Rahmawan, Detta, Jimi Narotama Mahameruaji, and Preciosa Alnashava Janitra. “Strategi Aktivisme Digital Di Indonesia: Aksesibilitas, Visibilitas, Popularitas Dan Ekosistem Aktivisme.” Jurnal Manajemen Komunikasi 4, no. 2 (April 29, 2020): 123–44. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmk.v4i2.26522.
Susanto, Hery. “Fenomena Campur Kode Mahasiswa Dalam Media Sosial.” Jurnal Linguistika, 2021.