Evaluating the Impact of Police Reform Initiatives on Public Trust and Accountability
Main Article Content
Abstract
The 2020-2024 reform of the Indonesian National Police (Polri), despite its focus on instrumental improvements, is widely deemed unsystematic and ineffective in enhancing public trust and accountability. This failure is underscored by low public trust and the incompletion of approximately 50% of 580,000 public complaints. This article argues that the stagnation of reform is not due to a lack of internal initiatives but stems from a permanent structural weakness in the external oversight mechanism, the National Police Commission (Kompolnas). Employing an Institutional Policy Analysis (IPA) and normative-empirical legal research, this study finds that Polri's centralized command structure and strong esprit de corps render self-reform prone to conflicts of interest. Consequently, Kompolnas's current authority, limited to non-binding recommendations, is insufficient. The primary novelty of this research is the proposition of a 2025 Legislative Reform: a fundamental revision of the Police Law to transform Kompolnas into an oversight body with legally binding executive authority, thereby creating an effective institutional counterbalance to ensure accountability.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
[1] S. N. Siregar, “Pencapaian Reformasi Instrumental POLRI 1999-2011,” J. Penelit. Polit., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 129–143, 2025, doi: 10.14203/jpp.v10i2.439.
[2] Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi, “Musrenbang Polri 2025, Menteri Rini: Polri Punya Peran Sentral dalam Reformasi Birokrasi dan Pencapaian Program Prioritas Pemerintah,” Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. [Online]. Available: https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/musrenbang-polri-2025-menteri-rini-polri-punya-peran-sentral-dalam-reformasi-birokrasi-dan-pencapaian-program-prioritas-pemerintah
[3] H. Herjawan, B. S. Laksmono, R. Robet, M. Luthfi, and V. S. Putera, “Best Practice Democratic Policing in Papua: Activating Development and Security through Community Participation,” Masy. J. Sosiol., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1–25, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.7454/MJS.v29i2.13575.
[4] Keputusan Asisten Kapolri Bidang Sumber Daya Manusia (SDM) Nomor: KEP/620/VI/2020 Tentang Rencana Strategis (Renstra) Sumber Daya Manusia Polri Tahun 2020-2024. 2020.
[5] A. Amostian, Y. Yusriyadi, and A. Silviana, “Reformasi Polri Melalui Penguatan Fungsi Dan Kewenangan Komisi Kepolisan Nasional Dalam Melakukan Pengawasan Eksternal Terhadap Polri,” J. Pembang. Huk. Indones., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 510–522, 2023, doi: 10.14710/jphi.v5i3.510-522.
[6] R. R. Addini, “Kinerja Polri: 580.000 Aduan Masyarakat Masuk, Cuma Tuntas Separuhnya,” CNBC Indonesia. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20250829153458-128-662657/kinerja-polri-580000-aduan-masyarakat-masuk-cuma-tuntas-separuhnya
[7] S. M. Kilonzo and A. Ojebode, “Research Methods for Public Policy,” in Public Policy and Research in Africa, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 63–85. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-99724-3_4.
[8] N. A. Setyawan, J. A. Purnomo, A. Y. Pranata, and D. Prasetyo, “The Functional Position In The Indonesian National Police,” J. Ilmu Kepol., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.35879/jik.v18i1.436.
[9] M. Riadi and D. Kurniawati, “Presisi sebagai Inovasi dan Strategi Membangun Citra Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Utara,” PERSPEKTIF, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1569–1581, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.31289/perspektif.v11i4.8096.
[10] C. Mouhanna, “Police Centralization and its Pathologies,” in Policing in France, Routledge, 2020, pp. 71–85. doi: 10.4324/9780429026928-5.
[11] A. Nurrahman, “Pakar Kritik Tim Reformasi Kepolisian Bentukan Kapolri,” Valid News. [Online]. Available: https://validnews.id/nasional/pakar-kritik-tim-reformasi-kepolisian-bentukan-kapolri
[12] M. D. Bonner, “What democratic policing is … and is not,” Polic. Soc., vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1044–1060, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10439463.2019.1649405.
[13] D. G. Gusman and D. N. Nazmi, “External Supervision System Reform in The State of TheRepublic of Indonesia,” J. Din. Huk., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 214–231, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.1.3419.