Law Enforcement of Assault Crimes in Boalemo Regency from Legal Certainty Perspective
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines law enforcement of assault crimes in Boalemo Regency from the perspective of legal certainty. The issue is important because police crime data from 2022 to 2024 show that assault remains a prominent local crime requiring consistent legal handling and community protection. This research uses empirical legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were obtained from police crime records, interviews with law enforcement officers and perpetrators, and relevant criminal law literature. The findings show that law enforcement must be assessed through the application of the Criminal Code, classification of assault, investigation procedures, article determination, victim protection, and limits of police discretion. Legal certainty is reflected in consistent reporting, evidence collection, case handling, and submission procedures. The study concludes that assault law enforcement in Boalemo requires accurate application of the applicable Criminal Code and stronger preventive legal education.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Anggraeniko, Litya Surisdani, Nurul Palah, and Dede Kania. “Perlindungan Korban Kekerasan Dalam Proses Pidana: Evaluasi KUHAP Dan Rekomendasi Reformasi Berdasarkan Standar HAM Internasional.” Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities 23 (2025): 124–33. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v23i.1557.
Ansori, Ansori Ansori. “Analisis Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Fisik Dalam Rumah Tangga.” Syiar Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 19, no. 1 (2021): 25–39. https://doi.org/10.29313/shjih.v19i1.7246.
Ardi, Muhamad Khalif, Muhammad Ikhsan Kamil, Devi Triasari, and Doris Rahmat. “Urgensi Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Adat Dalam Peraturan Tertulis Pasca Pengesahan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” WACANA HUKUM 29, no. 2 (2023): 130–45. https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v29i2.9829.
Armanda, Iqbal, and Nisa Fadhilah. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Penganiayaan Dalam Perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).” PESHUM Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Humaniora 4, no. 4 (2025): 5798–5806. https://doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v4i4.10121.
Dasuha, Deniro Fadjar Fachriza Purba, and Budiman Sinaga. “Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif Di Indonesia.” Jurnal ISO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Politik Dan Humaniora 6, no. 1 (2025): 10. https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v6i1.3216.
Elvia, Marissa, and Ery Satyanegara. “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian (Studi Perkara Nomor 281/Pid.B/2024/PN Kbu).” Arus Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora 5, no. 1 (2025): 515–20. https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v5i1.1077.
Fadli, Ardi. “Kepastian Hukum Dalam Mekanisme Pra Penuntutan Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Andalas University EThesis (Andalas University). Andalas University, 2018.
Hamid, Hasmiah. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Penganiayaan Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia,” 2018. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/uaqb6.
Lasmadi, Sahuri, Umar Hasan, and Elly Sudarti. “Tindakan Diskresi Oleh Penyidik Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Di Polres Tanjung Jabung Barat.” Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora 3, no. 2 (2019): 139–50. https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v3i2.8118.
M, Jericho Aquila A, Anggalana Anggalana, and Risti Dwi Ramasari. “Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat (Studi Putusan Nomor: 479/Pid.B/2024/PN.Tjk.).” AURELIA Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia 5, no. 1 (2026): 128–33. https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v5i1.6878.
Mulkan, Hasanal, Luil Maknun, and Heni Marlina. “Tanggungjawab Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Dipengarui Alkohol.” Disiplin Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda 28, no. 1 (2022): 19–24. https://doi.org/10.46839/disiplin.v28i1.63.
Nisa, Lailli Khoirun, and Fatma Nur Himatul Aliyah. “Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Mediasi Penal Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Tingkat Kepolisian.” INNOVATIVE Journal Of Social Science Research 3, no. 6 (2023): 8052–66. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i6.6466.
Palupi, Intan Diyah Tri. “Kegunaan Visum Et Repertum Pada Tahap Penyidikan Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studi Kasus Di Polres Wonosobo).” Transformasi Hukum 3, no. 2 (2026). https://doi.org/10.59579/wpk0y053.
Ramadhan, Muh. Syahrir, Mauluddin Mauluddin, Denny Mathius, and S Zulfikar Assegaf. “Laporan Kasus: Penganiayaan Akibat Benda Tajam.” ARMADA Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin 2, no. 5 (2024): 308–13. https://doi.org/10.55681/armada.v2i5.1302.
Susanti, Endang. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Jangka Waktu Proses Penyidikan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” MIZAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 2 (2021): 284. https://doi.org/10.32503/mizan.v10i2.2108.
Yasin, Yusuf Muhammad, and R Rahaditya. “Kualifikasi Kesalahan Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian.” Riwayat Educational Journal of History and Humanities 8, no. 4 (2025): 8289–8301. https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v8i4.51050.
Yusuf, Muhammad, M Said Karim, and Baharuddin Badaru. “Kedudukan Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Dakwaan Penuntut Umum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat.” Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG) 1, no. 2 (2020): 166–82. https://doi.org/10.52103/jlg.v1i2.93.