Public Ethics and the Legitimacy of Indonesian Democracy: Protests over DPR Allowances, Elite Conflict, and Civil Response Etika Publik dan Legitimasi Demokrasi Indonesia: Protes Tunjangan DPR, Konflik Elite, dan Respons Sipil
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the August 2025 controversy over parliamentary allowances in Indonesia as a critical case of public ethics failure and its impact on democratic legitimacy. By applying a qualitative case‐study approach and critical discourse analysis of primary news sources and academic literature, the research investigates elite rhetoric and actions that revealed profound disconnects from citizen realities. It further explores how digitally mediated civil responses transformed latent frustration into coordinated mass protests, amplifying challenges to institutional trust. The analysis situates these events within structural weaknesses of Indonesia’s “fat coalition” system, demonstrating how the absence of effective legislative opposition fosters elite impunity and ethical erosion. Findings highlight the causal sequence from coalition dynamics to oversight failure, elite misconduct, civic mobilization, and legitimacy crisis. The study concludes that without fundamental reforms to strengthen checks and balances particularly a functional legislative opposition Indonesia’s democracy remains vulnerable to recurring cycles of elite impunity and public distrust.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
[1] I. Patarai, B. Burhanuddin, and A. Saleh, “Analisis Pemilihan Serentak Ketua RW dan Ketua RT Kota Makassar Ditinjau Dari Aspek Etika Politik,” J. Pallangga Praja, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 96–118, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.33701/jpp.v2i1.1640.
[2] D. B. Resnik, “Scientific Research and the Public Trust,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 399–409, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9210-x.
[3] Kate Lamb and agencies, “Protests erupt in Indonesia over privileges for parliament members and ‘corrupt elites,” The Guardian. [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/26/indonesia-protests-austerity-parliament-member-privileges
[4] N. S. Love and M. Mattern, “The Great Recession: Causes, Consequences, and Responses,” New Polit. Sci., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 401–411, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1080/07393148.2011.619815.
[5] C. D. H. Nugroho, “A comparative analysis of electoral systems in Indonesia and the Philippines: Structure, process, and political representation,” J. Inov. Ilmu Sos. dan Polit., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 80–94, May 2025, doi: 10.33474/jisop.v7i1.23422.
[6] T. Duile and J. Bens, “Indonesia and the ‘conflictual consensus’: a discursive perspective on Indonesian democracy,” Crit. Asian Stud., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 139–162, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14672715.2017.1295358.
[7] S. Anthony and S. Jack, “Qualitative case study methodology in nursing research: an integrative review,” J. Adv. Nurs., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1171–1181, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04998.x.
[8] M. Morgan and P. Baert, “Chronology of Events,” in Conflict in the Academy, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015, pp. 11–22. doi: 10.1057/9781137521309_2.
[9] CNN Indonesia, “Kronologi Viral Gaji DPR Rp3 Juta per Hari-Dapat Uang Beras Rp12 Juta,” CNN Indonesia. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20250821092250-532-1264714/kronologi-viral-gaji-dpr-rp3-juta-per-hari-dapat-uang-beras-rp12-juta
[10] J. Higley, “Elite Theory and Elites,” in Handbook of Politics, 2010, pp. 161–176. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-68930-2_9.
[11] G.-G. Hognogi, M. Meltzer, F. Alexandrescu, and L. Ștefănescu, “The role of citizen science mobile apps in facilitating a contemporary digital agora,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 863, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02358-7.
[12] D. T. Hill and K. Sen, “The Internet in Indonesia’s new democracy,” Democratization, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 119–136, Mar. 2000, doi: 10.1080/13510340008403648.
[13] M. Gray-Hawkins, “Collective movements, digital activism, and protest events: The effectiveness of social media concerning the organization of large-scale political participation,” Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relations, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 64–69, 2018, doi: 10.22381/GHIR10220188.
[14] J. Dennis, Beyond Slacktivism. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-00844-4.
[15] D. Tomsa, “Regime resilience and presidential politics in Indonesia,” Contemp. Polit., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 266–285, May 2018, doi: 10.1080/13569775.2017.1413502.
[16] M. Susanto, S. D. Harijanti, F. Manan, W. Dramanda, and M. Y. A. Hernawan, “Fat Coalition and Crown-Presidentialism: A Critical Review of Indonesia’s Concurrent Elections,” PETITA J. Kaji. Ilmu Huk. dan Syariah, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35–54, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.22373/petita.v10i1.757.