Multidimensional Community Empowerment Based on Participatory Action Research in Rajeg Village, Tangerang Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Multidimensi Berbasis Participatory Action Research di Desa Rajeg, Tangerang
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Community Service Program (KKN) Team 207 Pranadipa Paramita in Rajeg Village, Tangerang Regency, employed a Participatory Action Research (PAR) methodology to empower the community across five key domains: education, religion, social cohesion, health, and environment. Iterative phases of participatory planning, collaborative action, observation, and reflection ensured interventions aligned with local needs and assets. In education, initiatives included tutoring, creative literacy sessions, and ecoprint workshops to foster creativity and environmental awareness. Religious and nationalistic activities, such as children’s recitation groups and Independence Day celebrations, effectively strengthened social cohesion and communal solidarity. Environmental innovations hydroponic training and Ecoplang installations with waste-sorting facilities increased household food security and waste management practices. Evaluation outcomes indicated improved academic capacity, active community engagement, and sustained behavioral change. Recommendations include forming hydroponic farming groups and formalizing youth organizations to sustain the programs. This study confirms that PAR is an effective approach for achieving sustainable, multidimensional community empowerment.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
[1] I. P. M. Astawa, I. W. Pugra, and M. Suardani, “Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Lanjut Usia dengan Pendekatan Asset Based Community Development (ABCD) di Dusun Kawan Desa Bakas Kabupaten Klungkung,” BHAKTI PERSADA, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 108–116, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.31940/bp.v8i2.108-116.
[2] J. W. Creswell, W. E. Hanson, V. L. Clark Plano, and A. Morales, “Qualitative Research Designs,” Couns. Psychol., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 236–264, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1177/0011000006287390.
[3] V. Lopez, E. Clancy, and M. Torres, “Critical Youth Participatory Action Research With System‐Impacted Youth: A Scoping Review,” Sociol. Compass, vol. 19, no. 7, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1111/soc4.70090.
[4] Tim Yayasan Semai Jiwa Amini, Bullying: mengatasi kekerasan di sekolah dan lingkungan sekitar anak. PT. Grasindo, 2008.
[5] F. Shahira et al., “Pembuatan Ecoprint dengan Teknik Pounding untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Anak-Anak di Yayasan Al Amanah Sidoarjo,” Bima Abdi J. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 289–298, May 2025, doi: 10.53299/bajpm.v5i2.1528.
[6] A. M. Arif, “Perspektif Teori Sosial Emile Durkheim Dalam Sosiologi Pendidikan,” Moderasi J. Stud. Ilmu Pengetah. Sos., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–14, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.24239/moderasi.Vol1.Iss2.28.
[7] M. Masripah, A. Al Firdaus, and H. Firmansyah, “Membangun Solidaritas Sosial dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an Prinsip Ukhuwah Islamiyah,” Action Res. J. Indones., vol. 7, no. 1, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.61227/arji.v7i1.283.
[8] M. R. Saputra and N. Hilyatunisa, “Towards 13 Years of Compulsory Education: Strategies for Equitable Access to Quality Education in Indonesia,” J. Smart Pedagog. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.cerdaspedia.com/index.php/spedu/article/view/21
[9] R. Febriyanti, N. V. A. Rahayu, W. D. Pitaloka, A. Yakob, and M. Samsuri, “Edukasi Pemilahan Sampah sebagai Upaya Penanganan Masalah Sampah di SD Muhammadiyah Baitul Fallah Mojogedang,” Bul. KKN Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 37–45, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.23917/bkkndik.v5i1.22456.