Optimizing Participatory Approach through KKN Programs for Empowering Five Pillars in Sukadamai Optimalisasi Pendekatan Partisipatif melalui Program KKN untuk Pemberdayaan Lima Pilar Desa Sukadamai
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Community Service Program (KKN) in Sukadamai Village, Cikupa, Tangerang applies a participatory approach to empower five pillars: economy, education, health, religion, and environment. Through preliminary surveys, socialization, and intensive collaboration with village authorities and residents, students designed and implemented digital literacy training for MSMEs, child literacy programs, posyandu activities, religious events, and waste management initiatives. Evaluation revealed enhanced MSME digital capacity, increased children’s reading interest, improved nutritional awareness, social cohesion, and eco-friendly practices. A significant sense of ownership emerged among residents, overcoming time constraints and economic priorities. The synthesis of Participatory Action Research and Asset-Based Community Development principles strengthens contextual relevance. These findings confirm the effectiveness of micro-level participatory interventions in generating sustainable impact in peri-urban areas. Recommendations include establishing a sustainability unit and strategic partnerships for program replication.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
[1] T. Widyawati et al., “Empowering Indonesian Da’wah Academy North Sumatera Students through AI-Driven Content Creation,” ABDIMAS Talent. J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 188–193, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.32734/abdimastalenta.v9i2.18293.
[2] V. Lopez, E. Clancy, and M. Torres, “Critical Youth Participatory Action Research With System‐Impacted Youth: A Scoping Review,” Sociol. Compass, vol. 19, no. 7, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1111/soc4.70090.
[3] D. Z. Rahmadani, M. Kamil, and S. Salahudin, “Community Empowerment in Improving the Quality of Slums: A Structured Literature Review,” Mimb. J. Sos. dan Pembang., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 410–418, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.29313/mimbar.v37i2.8072.
[4] G. H. Wiratomo, D. Sundawa, N. Kristiono, and E. P. Nugraheni, “Preserving Pancasila Through Values and Character in Cultural Citizenship of Plural Communities,” J. Moral Kemasyarakatan, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 558–571, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.21067/jmk.v10i1.11433.
[5] S. Botoon, “Unveiling Disadvantages Faced by Refugee Professionals: A Review of Intersecting Challenges in Professional Reintegration,” Sociol. Compass, vol. 19, no. 4, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1111/soc4.70061.
[6] A. Mustanir, K. Sellang, A. A. Adnan, and S. Lubis, “Tracing the Evolution of Community Empowerment Models in Development Planning,” J. Ilmu Sos. dan Ilmu Polit., vol. 28, no. 3, p. 400, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.22146/jsp.99202.
[7] I. P. M. Astawa, I. W. Pugra, and M. Suardani, “Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Lanjut Usia dengan Pendekatan Asset Based Community Development (ABCD) di Dusun Kawan Desa Bakas Kabupaten Klungkung,” BHAKTI PERSADA, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 108–116, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.31940/bp.v8i2.108-116.
[8] G. H. Wiratomo, D. Sundawa, N. Kristiono, and E. P. Nugraheni, “Preserving Pancasila Through Values and Character in Cultural Citizenship of Plural Communities,” J. Moral Kemasyarakatan, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 558 – 571, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.21067/jmk.v10i1.11433.