Constitutional Integration of Customary Law in Criminal Case Handling Mechanisms Based on the National Criminal Code (Law Number 1 of 2023)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The reform of criminal law through Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code marks a paradigm shift from a retributive approach to corrective, restorative, and rehabilitative justice. One important aspect of this reform is the constitutional recognition of living law, including customary criminal law. This recognition affirms that customary law has a legitimate position as a basis for criminal punishment, with criminal provisions that can be in the form of fulfilling local customary obligations. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach to analyze how the integration of customary criminal law into criminal case handling mechanisms can be implemented constitutionally within the framework of the National Criminal Code. The results show that customary criminal cases are still handled within the general criminal justice system, without the establishment of a separate customary court. However, customary leaders play a crucial role as experts in explaining violated customary norms, while the resolution of cases is directed towards restorative justice that aligns with the principles of the 1945 Constitution and Pancasila. These findings confirm that the constitutional integration of customary law into the national criminal justice system is a crucial step in realizing substantive justice, legal pluralism, and harmonization between national law and local values prevalent in society.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Book
Andi Hamzah, 2016, Hukum Acara Pidana, Jakarta : Sinar Grafik
Eddy O. S. Hiariej & Topo Santoso, 2025, Anotasi KUHP Nasional, Depok : Rajawali Pers
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia, 2025, Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana
Jimly Asshiddiqie dan M. Ali Safa’at, 2006, Teori Hans Kalsen Tentang Hukum, Jakarta: Sekretaris Jenderal & Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI
Muhaimin, 2020, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram : Mataram University Press
Journal Articel
Aisha Nurul Fadilla, et.al, 2024, Analisis Pengaturan Living Law dalam RUU KUHP yang Dituangkan pada Peraturan Daerah Ditinjau Berdasarkan Konstitusi, Jurnal Jurist-Distion, Vol 7, No. 2 https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v7i2.56121
Beni Kharisma Arrasuli, 2023, Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Adat dalam Rancangan KUHP: Problematika Asas Legalitas dan Over-Kriminalisasi, Jurnal Unes Law Review, Vol 6, No. 1 https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.879
Bonifasius Petrus Sando Mokorimban, 2024, Fungsi, Tugas, Dan Wewenang Kejaksaan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Menurut Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2021, Jurnal Lex Privatum, Vol 13, No. 4 https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/56576
Cynthia Cornelia Leasa, et.al, 2024, Penyelidikan Dan Penyidikan Dalam Perkara Pidana, Jurnal Tatohi, Vol 4, No. 6 https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i6.2454
Fianusman Laia, et.al, 2024, Eksitensi Hukum Adat Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Perzinaan, Jurnal Panah Keadilan, Vol. 3 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.57094/jpk.v3i1.1444
Lilik Mulyadi, 2013, Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Adat Di Indonesia : Pengkajian Asas, Norma, Teori, Praktik Dan Prosedurnya, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol 2 No 2 https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.225-246
Milenia Ramadhani, 2024, Tantangan Implementasi Pengakuan Hukum Adat Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Baru Di Indonesia, Jurnal Syntax Idea, Vol 6, No. 8 https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i8.4356
Nindy Putri Nur Efendi dan Eva Achjani Zulfa, 2024, Sinergi atau Konflik: Pasal 2 KUHP 2023 dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Jurnal Nagari Law Review, Vol 8, No 2 https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.8.i.2.p.371-382.2024
Rahmat Hi. Abdulah, 2015, Urgensi Hukum Adat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional, Jurnal Fiat Justisia, Vol 9, No. 2 https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v9no2.595
Rikiansyah, et.al, 2024, Kajian Filsafat Hukum terhadap Perubahan Paradigma Hukum Pidana di Indonesia: Dari Pembalasan ke Pemulihan, Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, Vol 1, No. 4 https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i4.2719
Tobi Haryadi dan Zakaria, 2024, Eksistensi Saksi Ahli Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia, Jurnal Disiplin, Vol 30, No 2 https://ojs.stihpada.ac.id/index.php/disiplin/article/view/1178
Tri Astuti Handayani dan Andrianto Prabowo, 2024, Analisis Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional, Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum, Vol. 5 No.1 https://doi.org/10.55551/jip.v5i1.95
Internet
Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, RUU KUHAP https://icjr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/RUU-KUHAP-20-Maret-2025.pdf