Hedonic Gratification Versus Risk Paranoia in the Sharing Economy: The Strategic Architecture of Generation Z Platform Retention
Main Article Content
Abstract
The global sharing economy faces a strategic paradox regarding user retention, particularly among Generation Z digital natives who demand immersive hedonic gratification yet simultaneously exhibit extreme risk paranoia. This study aims to structurally map the behavioral architecture of collaborative consumption by evaluating how hedonic value, perceived ease of use, and perceived risk influence behavioral intention through the mediation of consumer attitude. Employing a quantitative explanatory design, primary data was extracted from 400 Generation Z respondents in Central Java, Indonesia, and analyzed using Variance-Based Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The empirical results demonstrate that hedonic value and perceived ease of use significantly cultivate positive attitudes, whereas perceived risk operates as a systemic cognitive destructor that substantially degrades these affirmative evaluations. Furthermore, attitude functions as the ultimate central mediator that deterministically drives sustainable collaborative consumption intentions. These findings theoretically advance the Stimulus-Organism-Response paradigm by proving that affective stimulation outpaces traditional utilitarian calculus within emerging digital markets. Strategically, this research provides a prescriptive blueprint for platform architects, compelling a managerial pivot toward digital infrastructures that simultaneously neutralize cybersecurity threats and deliver highly gamified experiences to secure long-term commercial viability.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Ahmad, L. B., Arnita, D., & Nasution, R. A. (2025). Attitudinal Factors Influencing Digital Collaborative Consumption Among Internet Users: A Confirmatory Study in Indonesia. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 27(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.v27i2.21209
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
Arrigo, E. (2021). Collaborative consumption in the fashion industry: A systematic literature review and conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 325, 129261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129261
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Sage Publications.
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Disporapar Jawa Tengah. (2024). Naskah Indeks Pembangunan Pemuda (IPP) Provinsi Jawa Tengah 2024. https://dispora.jatengprov.go.id/content/files/Naskah Indeks Pembangunan Pemuda (IPP) Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2025-1771907008.pdf
Gadeikienė, A., Kanopiene, A., Gaidelis, M., & Svarcaite, A. (2026). Factors determining collaborative consumption intentions in accommodation services. Innovative Marketing, 22(2), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.22(2).2026.08
Haji-Othman, Y., Sheh Yusuff, M. S., & Md Hussain, M. N. (2024). Data Analysis Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in Conducting Quantitative Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(10), 2380–2388. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i10/23364
Harjadi, D., & Gunardi, A. (2022). Factors affecting eco-friendly purchase intention: subjective norms and ecological consciousness as moderators. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2148334
Hofmann, E., Hartl, B., & Penz, E. (2017). Power versus trust – what matters more in collaborative consumption? Journal of Services Marketing, 31(6), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-09-2015-0279
Huang, B., Suri, A., Tezer, A., & Sénécal, S. (2024). This is not mine anymore: The dark side of collaborative consumption. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 41(4), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.05.002
Jha, S., & Kumar, B. (2026). Understanding collaborative consumption behavior in the context of car-sharing: an ethical perspective and empirical analysis. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 43(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2025-7626
Krisyanti, N. N., & Sari, S. P. (2026). Generasi Z dan Keputusan Investasi: Merangkai Sinergi Literasi Keuangan, Lingkungan Sosial, Pengetahuan Akuntansi, dan Pengetahuan Investasi. Jurnal Economic Resource, 9(1), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.57178/jer.v9i1.2305
Kurniawan, B., Susanto, E., Rahmawati, E., & Nasir, A. (2026). The Economic Impact of the Sharing Economy on Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Indonesia. Economica Insight, 2(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.71094/ecoin.v2i2.326
Małecka, A., Mitręga, M., & Pfajfar, G. (2022). Segmentation of collaborative consumption consumers: Social identity theory perspective. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(6), 2445–2465. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12798
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Mittendorf, C. (2018). Collaborative consumption: the role of familiarity and trust among Millennials. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-12-2016-2040
Monticone, F., Samoggia, A., & Viti, E. (2024). Are apps for urban food purchasing and consumption meeting Italian consumers’ needs? A mixed-methods analysis. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(6), 2862–2882. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2376
Mu, W., & Yi, Y. (2024). The impact of characteristic factors of the direct-to-consumer marketing model on consumer loyalty in the digital intermediary era. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1347588
Nurbaiti, N. (2023). Characteristics of Internet, Smartphone, and Social Media Usage among Generation Z in South Jakarta after the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Health Sciences and Epidemiology, 1(3), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.62404/jhse.v1i3.26
Prabowo, P., Adhitama, L. V., Pasaribu, M. L., Ratnaning, E. R., Witaning, L., & Tandela, T. (2026). Analysis of Trust Level and Online Medicine Purchase Decisions among Generation Z in Jombang. Journal of Marine Pharmacy and Biomedicine, 1(1), 21–28. https://propanoramic.com/index.php/JMPB/article/view/632
Ramos, E. C., & Ramos, C. M. Q. (2025). User-Generated Content and Its Impact on Purchase Intent for Tourism Products: A Comparative Analysis of Millennials and Centennials on TikTok. Future Internet, 17(3), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17030105
Renaldi, A., Hati, S. R. H., Ghazali, E., Sumarwan, U., & Ramayah, T. (2024). The determinants of customer loyalty in the sharing economy: a study of the largest local food delivery apps in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2364055
Saputra, P. R., & Hayatin, N. (2019). Model Platform Sharing Economy di Indonesia Study Kasus: Unicorn Lokal. DIALEKTIKA : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial, 4(2), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.36636/dialektika.v4i2.350
Tham, W. K., Lim, W. M., & Vieceli, J. (2023). Foundations of consumption and production in the sharing economy. Electronic Commerce Research, 23(4), 2979–3002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09593-1
Utamanyu, R. A., & Darmastuti, R. (2022). Budaya Belanja Online Generasi Z dan Generasi Milenial di Jawa Tengah (Studi Kasus Produk Kecantikan di Online Shop Beauty by ASAME). Scriptura, 12(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.9744/scriptura.12.1.58-71
Vukovic, N. A., Larionova, V. A., & Morganti, P. (2021). Smart Sustainable Cities: Smart Approaches and Analysis. Economy of Region, 17(3), 1004–1013. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-20
Wang, Q., Li, X., & Yan, X. (2026). Uncovering the power of influencer–product congruence in live e-commerce: an impression management lens and gender difference. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 126(2), 622–649. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2024-1164
Yeoh, R.-Q., Perumal, S., & Jaganathan, M. (2024). A bibliometric analysis: The R-tool for analysing the technology acceptance model (TAM) in scopus. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(5), 2025149. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025149
Zhao, J., & Peng, Z. (2019). Shared Short-Term Rentals for Sustainable Tourism in the Social-Network Age: The Impact of Online Reviews on Users’ Purchase Decisions. Sustainability, 11(15), 4064. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154064