Analyzing Artificial Intelligence Legal Ethics: Global Justice Perspectives in the Digital Era

Main Article Content

Ari Wahyudi

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence into global judicial systems presents profound ethical and legal challenges. This research investigates the impact of algorithmic opacity and systemic bias on substantive justice, specifically emphasizing the technological divide between the Global North and South. Utilizing normative legal research with comparative and philosophical approaches, this study synthesizes Rawlsian justice principles, capability frameworks, and local Pancasila values. The analysis reveals that unregulated artificial intelligence deployment directly threatens human rights and exacerbates digital imperialism by marginalizing developing nations. To achieve sustainable global justice, the findings advocate for a crucial paradigm shift toward human centered governance. Strategic solutions include formulating inclusive multilateral policies, mandating strict algorithmic transparency, empowering digital sovereignty, and establishing comprehensive national regulations. Ultimately, rigorous ethical oversight must remain paramount over mere computational efficiency to ensure that artificial intelligence serves as an equitable instrument for empowering humanity instead of widening existing social disparities worldwide today.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wahyudi, Ari. “Analyzing Artificial Intelligence Legal Ethics: Global Justice Perspectives in the Digital Era”. Siyasah Dusturiyah: State Law Review, vol. 1, no. 4, Jan. 2026, pp. 69-81, https://doi.org/10.65101/mxzsx259.

References

Bengio, Yoshua, Max Tegmark, Stuart Russell, Dawn Song, Sören Mindermann, Lan Xue, Stephen Casper, et al. “The Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities.” SuperIntelligence - Robotics - Safety & Alignment 2, no. 5 (August 11, 2025): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.70777/si.v2i5.15503.

Comim, Flavio, P. B. Anand, and Shailaja Fennell, eds. Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities. Cambridge University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009232678.

Edwards, Nate. “AI for Justice and Justice for AI: Why Access to Justice Enables Better AI Governance.” New York University Center on International Cooperation, 2025. https://cic.nyu.edu/resources/ai-for-justice-and-justice-for-ai-why-access-to-justice-enables-better-ai-governance/.

Fernando, Zico Junius, and Ariesta Wibisono Anditya. “AI on The Bench: The Future of Judicial Systems in The Age of Artificial Intelligence.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 13, no. 3 (November 30, 2024): 523–50. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.3.2024.523-550.

Jacobides, Michael G., Annabelle Gawer, Nikolaus Lang, and David Zuluaga Martínez. “The Political Economy and Geopolitics of AI Regulation.” Management and Business Review 5, no. 4 (December 4, 2025): 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/2694104X251404322.

Khotimah, Amalia Nurul, Zunnuraeni, and Ayu Riska Amalia. “Analisis Yuridis Penggunaan AI-Based Autonomous Weapon System Dalam Konflik Bersenjata Berdasarkan Hukum Humaniter Internasional.” Mataram Journal of International Law 3, no. 1 (June 18, 2025): 60–77. https://doi.org/10.29303/majil.v3i1.7011.

Kirana, Kimmy Baby, and Wilma Silalahi. “Tantangan Regulasi Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Data Pribadi Di Indonesia.” Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 5, no. 6 (June 24, 2025): 1807–17. https://doi.org/10.59141/cerdika.v5i6.2711.

Litschka, Michael. “AI Ethics and the Capability Approach.” Genealogy+Critique 11, no. 1 (April 5, 2025): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.16995/gc.18499.

Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. “The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.” Big Data & Society 3, no. 2 (December 1, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679.

Narter & Partners. “Artificial Intelligence and Law: Ethical and Regulatory Framework.” Narter & Partners, 2025. https://www.narterlaw.com/en/artificial-intelligence-and-law-ethical-and-regulatory-framework/.

Pogge, Thomas. “Rawls and Global Justice.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18, no. 2 (June 1, 1988): 227–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1988.10717175.

Princes, Elfindah, Rasji Rasji, and Michael. “The Concept of Justice in AI-Driven Legal Decision Making.” Bit-Tech 8, no. 1 (August 10, 2025): 78–86. https://doi.org/10.32877/bt.v8i1.2338.

Rebi, Adia, Rissa Afni Martinouva, Erlina Gunsu Nurmansyah, Meryon Hariputra, Emilia Susanti, Andi Metrawijaya, Andriyan Saputra, et al. Hukum Pancasila & Globalisasi. Edited by Eddy Rifai. Bandar Lampung: Pusaka Media, 2023.

Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla. “Reformulasi UU ITE Terhadap Artificial Intelligence Dibandingkan Dengan Uni Eropa Dan China AI Act Regulation.” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW 7, no. 3 (December 14, 2024): 1737–58. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i3.10578.

Smuha, Nathalie A., ed. The Cambridge Handbook of the Law, Ethics and Policy of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009367783.

Socol de la Osa, David Uriel, and Nydia Remolina. “Artificial Intelligence at the Bench: Legal and Ethical Challenges of Informing—or Misinforming—Judicial Decision-Making through Generative AI.” Data & Policy 6 (December 2, 2024): e59. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2024.53.

Syarief, Amiroel, and Merina Pratiwi. “Legal Review of the Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial System in Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 4, no. 04 (July 30, 2025): 164–72. https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v4i04.2074.

The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law. “How Can We Leverage AI to Solve Justice Problems for All?” HiiL, 2025. https://www.hiil.org/news/how-do-we-best-leverage-ai-to-solve-justice-problems-for-all/.

Theofransus Litaay. “Theory of Justice’s Principles For A Just and Equitable Global Order.” Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 6, no. 1 (November 4, 2025): 567–77. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2548.

Wachter, Sandra, Brent Mittelstadt, and Luciano Floridi. “Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation.” International Data Privacy Law 7, no. 2 (May 2017): 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx005.

Westerstrand, Salla. “Reconstructing AI Ethics Principles: Rawlsian Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.” Science and Engineering Ethics 30, no. 5 (October 9, 2024): 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00507-y.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.