Institutional Trust and Behavioral Norms in Digital Tax Administration: An Integrative Synthesis

Main Article Content

Sonny Sonny
Haris Maupa
Indra Widjaja

Abstract

Contemporary state economic policies frequently implement digital tax infrastructure under the deterministic assumption that technological surveillance directly guarantees fiscal adherence, creating an institutional blind spot regarding taxpayer behavioral resistance. This study conducted a configurational literature review utilizing qualitative political economy frameworks to evaluate the structural interconnections among regulatory technology, authority power, and localized compliance norms across thirteen macroeconomic jurisdictions. The synthesized analysis demonstrates that digital tax enforcement functions strictly as an administrative capability multiplier rather than an autonomous regulatory solution. While electronic registries and automated auditing decrease transactional friction, coercive digital mandates actively trigger compensatory evasion strategies in environments lacking procedural fairness. Institutional trust and perceived state legitimacy constantly act as mandatory structural mediators that effectively translate digital monitoring capabilities into sustainable voluntary adherence. Diverging from classical deterrence models, this framework confirms that digital fiscal modernizations inherently require synchronized state investments in governance transparency to achieve structural macroeconomic stability globally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sonny, Sonny, et al. “Institutional Trust and Behavioral Norms in Digital Tax Administration: An Integrative Synthesis”. Journal of State Economic Research, vol. 2, no. 1, Aug. 2026, pp. 1-21, https://doi.org/10.65101/jser.v2i1.493.

References

Agusti, Rosalita Rachma, and Aulia Fuad Rahman. “Determinants of Tax Attitude in Small and Medium Enterprises: Evidence from Indonesia.” Cogent Business & Management 10, no. 1 (December 31, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2160585.

Allingham, Michael G., and Agnar Sandmo. “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics 1, no. 3–4 (November 1972): 323–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2.

Atayah, Osama F., and Muneer M. Alshater. “Audit and Tax in the Context of Emerging Technologies: A Retrospective Analysis, Current Trends, and Future Opportunities.” The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, May 17, 2021, 95–128. https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v21_4.

Batrancea, Larissa M., Anca Nichita, Ruggero De Agostini, Fabricio Batista Narcizo, Denis Forte, Samuel de Paiva Neves Mamede, Ana Maria Roux-Cesar, et al. “A Self-Employed Taxpayer Experimental Study on Trust, Power, and Tax Compliance in Eleven Countries.” Financial Innovation 8, no. 1 (November 23, 2022): 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00404-y.

Deshmukh, Arun Kumar, Ashutosh Mohan, and Ishi Mohan. “Goods and Services Tax (GST) Implementation in India: A SAP–LAP–Twitter Analytic Perspective.” Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 23, no. 2 (June 26, 2022): 165–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00297-3.

e Hassan, Ibn, Ahmed Naeem, and Sidra Gulzar. “Voluntary Tax Compliance Behavior of Individual Taxpayers in Pakistan.” Financial Innovation 7, no. 1 (December 31, 2021): 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00234-4.

Górecki, Maciej A., and Natalia Letki. “Social Norms Moderate the Effect of Tax System on Tax Evasion: Evidence from a Large-Scale Survey Experiment.” Journal of Business Ethics 172, no. 4 (September 16, 2021): 727–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04502-8.

Kasper, Matthias, and James Alm. “Audits, Audit Effectiveness, and Post-Audit Tax Compliance.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 195 (March 2022): 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.01.003.

Kassa, Erstu Tarko. “Factors Influencing Taxpayers to Engage in Tax Evasion: Evidence from Woldia City Administration Micro, Small, and Large Enterprise Taxpayers.” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 10, no. 1 (December 16, 2021): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-00142-4.

Kochanova, Anna, Zahid Hasnain, and Bradley Larson. “Does E-Government Improve Government Capacity? Evidence from Tax Compliance Costs, Tax Revenue, and Public Procurement Competitiveness.” The World Bank Economic Review 34, no. 1 (February 1, 2020): 101–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx024.

Mascagni, Giulia, Andualem T. Mengistu, and Firew B. Woldeyes. “Can ICTs Increase Tax Compliance? Evidence on Taxpayer Responses to Technological Innovation in Ethiopia.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 189 (September 2021): 172–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.06.007.

Nguyen, Thi Thuy Dương, Thi My Linh Pham, Thanh Tam Le, Thi Hoai Linh Truong, and Manh Dung Tran. “Determinants Influencing Tax Compliance: The Case of Vietnam.” The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 7, no. 2 (February 28, 2020): 65–73. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no2.65.

Nurkholis, Nurkholis, Muh Dularif, and Ni Wayan Rustiarini. “Tax Evasion and Service-Trust Paradigm: A Meta-Analysis.” Edited by Collins G. Ntim. Cogent Business & Management 7, no. 1 (January 1, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1827699.

Page, Matthew J, Joanne E McKenzie, Patrick M Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C Hoffmann, Cynthia D Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, et al. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews.” BMJ, March 29, 2021, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

Sebele-Mpofu, Favourate Y. “Governance Quality and Tax Morale and Compliance in Zimbabwe’s Informal Sector.” Edited by Collins G. Ntim. Cogent Business & Management 7, no. 1 (January 1, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1794662.

Snyder, Hannah. “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 104 (November 2019): 333–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.